Suzuki Access 125 Fi vs Yamaha Mio Fazzio
Suzuki Access 125 Fi Tk 2,05,000 |
Yamaha Mio Fazzio |
Engine & transmission
| Type | 4 Cycle, 1-Cylinder, Air Cooled | Air Cooled, 4-stroke, SOHC, 2 Valve |
|---|---|---|
| Engine cc | 124 cc | 125 cc |
| Maxpower | 8.7ps@7000 rpm | 6.2kW(8.4PS)/6500r/min |
| Max torque | 10.2Nm @5000 rpm | 9.9N・m(1.0kgf・m)/5000r/min |
| Engine bore | 52.50 mm | 52.40 mm |
| Stroke | 57.40 mm | 57.90 mm |
| Fuel System | Fuel Injection | Fuel Injection |
| Compression Ratio | -- | 11.0:1 |
| Cooling System | Air Cooled | Air Cooled |
| Clutch | -- | Automatic |
| Starting Method | Electric | Electric |
Body
| Length | 1870 mm | 1820 mm |
|---|---|---|
| Width | 655 mm | 685 mm |
| Height | 1160 mm | 1125 mm |
| Seat Height | 773 mm | 750 mm |
| Wheelbase | 1265 mm | 1280 mm |
| Ground Clearance | 160 mm | 135 mm |
| Fuel Tank | 5.60 liter | 5.10 liter |
| Weight | 101 kg | 95 kg |
Brakes, wheels & suspension
| Suspension Front | Telescopic | Telescopic Fork |
|---|---|---|
| Suspension Rear | Swing Arm | Unit Swing |
| Wheel Front Type | Alloy | Alloy |
| Wheel Rear Type | Alloy | Alloy |
| Tire Type | Tubeless | Tubeless |
| Tire Front | 90/90 -12 | 110/70-12 47L |
| Tire Rear | 90/100-10 | 110/70-12 47L |
| Brake Front | Disc | Disc |
| Brake Rear | Drum | Drum |
Electricals
| Battery Type | MF | YTZ6V MF |
|---|---|---|
| Battery Capacity | 3Ah | 5.0Ah |
| Battery Voltage | 12V | 12V |
| Head Lamp | 12V 35/35W | LED |
| Turn Lamp | Yes | Yes |
| Pass Switch | Yes | -- |
| Tail Light | LED | 12V, 18/5W x 1 |
Performance
| Mileage | 55 Kmpl | 50 Kmpl |
|---|---|---|
| Topspeed | -- | 90 Kmph |
Features
| Speedometer | Digital | Digital |
|---|---|---|
| Odometer | -- | Digital |
| Tripmeter | -- | Digital |
| Fuel Indicator | Yes | Yes |
| Seat Type | Single | Single |
| Handle Type | Standard | Scooter Type |
Others
| No. Cylinders | 1 | 1 |
|---|---|---|
| Drive Type | Belt Drive | Belt Drive |
| Carry Hook | No | No |
| Pros | * A Combined Braking System (CBS). * One of The Most Refined Scooter. * Retains Its Performance. * Superb Ride Quality. * High Torque. | -- |
| Cons | * External Fuel-filler Cap Isn’t Exactly Convenient. * Brakes Could Have Been Better. * Small Wheelbase. | -- |
| Colors | Soild Ice Green, Metallic Dark Greenish Blue, Metallic Matte Black | Cyan, Red, White |